2026 SOTA Challenge (Part 1)

2026 Challenge

A number of people have asked about whether we will be having a challenge in 2026, and I am pleased to say on behalf of the SOTA MT, that, yes, we will be having a challenge. The purpose of challenges typically is to encourage activity on under-utilised bands or modes. This year, this band and mode combination made up less than 1% of all QSOs logged by activators, and so we are choosing to make the challenge…

2m/70cm SSB/CW

The MT believes this provides a great opportunity for interesting QSOs in the coming year. Many activators and chasers will have access to equipment already for these bands and modes - whether the old faithful FT-817 and FT-857s or newer options like the 2m option for the KX3, the timely CW modification to the cheap and cheerful Quansheng handhelds or the ubiquitous 2m transverter kits available on various auction sites for relatively low cost. Many antenna options are available, whether lightweight yagis, hentennas, oblongs, quads, flowerpots or J-poles (slim or otherwise). Many propagation modes are available. This should provide an interesting and challenging year for each individual participating, where the activators and chasers will have their work cut out to make QSOs under different conditions and via different means.

Scoring format

Given that SSB and CW are considered useful as DX modes on these bands, points will be awarded based on distance, number of summits activated and unique callsigns logged in an activation.

Activators

Your score will be 1pt/km for each QSO with a unique callsign (per summit) activated within the year, multiplied by the number of unique summits activated.

Chasers

Your score will be 1pt/km for each QSO with a unique callsign (per summit) chased within the year, multiplied by the number of unique summits chased.

Example

An activator climbs a summit, VK0/AA-123, and makes four contacts on 144MHz SSB, with VK0ABC, VK0DEF, VK0GHI AND VK0JKL. Each of these contacts is 110km, 120km, 80km, and 90km respectively. For this summit, they will receive 110+120+80+90 = 400 summit points. They have climbed 1 summit, so their total points is 400x1 = 400 points. They then climb VK0/AA-456, and make another four contacts, VK0ABC, VK0DEF, VK0GHI AND VK0MNO on 144MHz, and one contact with VK0ABC on 70cm. Each of these contacts is 210km, 220km, 280km, and 290km respectively. This is a new unique summit, so each distinct callsign for this summit counts for points - so 210+220+280+290 = 1000 points. The second contact with VK0ABC does not count for points. After two summits, their points tally is now (400 + 1000)x2 = 2800 points.

Finally, they go back to VK0/AA-123 and make another two contacts, this time with VK0PQR over a distance of 300km, and with VK0STU, who does not provide a location. VK0STU does not provide a location, so no points will count. As VK0PQR is a new unique callsign for the summit, this is now added to their score for VK0/AA-123, so their points score for the summit is now (400 + 300) = 700 summit points. Their total points score is (700+1000)x2 = 3400 points.

Entering location data

For QSOs to count, the location of the chaser must be provided (the activator location is of course the registered summit location that they are activating), and details exchanged as part of the QSO. If a chaser chooses not to provide their location, activators must not obtain it from other sources like QRZ. This information can then be entered in several different ways:

S2S entries

The position of both activators is known, nothing needs to be entered other than the summit references.

Activators

ADIF format

Using any of the <LAT> / <LON>, <GRIDSQUARE>, <POTA_REF> or <WWFF_REF> fields to a QSO record will add location data automatically, in that priority order (if multiple are specified).

FLE format

Adding the grid reference after a ‘#’, or including the POTA or WWFF references as part of the record will add location data automatically, in that priority order (if multiple are specified). I don’t believe there is a way of specifying lat/long pairs as part of the FLE format (other than to follow the approach for CSV files below)

CSV format

The SOTA CSV format has supported location entry for a while, although the format is perhaps a little cryptic unless you chase Microwave awards. Within the comment field, you can specify either lat/long using %QTH%-12.3456,123.4567% (latitude first, longitude second, using decimal degrees and ‘-’ for West and South), or you can specify a grid reference using %QRA%AA22bb% instead.

Manually

If you edit an upload, you can select the relevant activation QSO and select the “Map” icon at the end of each QSO row to add in additional location data, either as lat/long, grid reference, POTA reference or WWFF reference.

Chasers

ADIF

Using any of the <MY_LAT> / <MY_LON>, <MY_GRIDSQUARE>, <MY_POTA_REF> or <MY_WWFF_REF> fields to a chaser record will add location data automatically, in that priority order (if multiple are specified).

CSV

Similar to activators, within the comment field, you can specify either lat/long using %QTH%-12.3456,123.4567% (latitude first, longitude second, using decimal degrees and - for West and South), or you can specify a grid reference using %QRA%AA22bb% instead.

Manually via SOTAData

There is now a field on the Chaser upload dialog for location data. By default, this will be populated with the latitude and longitude taken from your SSO profile (if present). Please make sure you have your latitude and longitude around the right way…

Manually Via SOTAWatch

There is now a field on the Log Chaser button for location data. By default, this will be populated with the latitude and longitude taken from your SSO profile (if present). Please make sure you have your latitude and longitude around the right way…

20 Likes

Great!
And when would this challenge start?
73 de JP3PPL

I made this arrangement (nested oblong loops) four years ago. I’m ready to go!

8 Likes

FUjMOA

Best. News. EVER. :star_struck: :ok_hand:

3 Likes

All of 2026, so 1 January 0000 UTC to 31 December 2359 UTC

4 Likes

This is excellent news and well timed for the return of my newly-repaired and underused FT817. Some locals and I were discussing ways to promote interest in 2m SSB/CW for our regional Wainwrights On The Air (WOTA) scheme and having the 2026 SOTA Challenge will help foster interest.

73 Andy

2 Likes

Cue to the angry posts on the reflector about QSOs not earning points.

Jokes aside, this is excellent.

I agree Andy @G8CPZ Sounds like good fun to me, albeit I’m mostly chasing these days unless I go on holiday somewhere interesting and activate there. I think for the scoring points angle using Maidenhead Locators, ADIF MASTER will be my best friend when submitting my log. I probably won’t need to depart much from my current method when submitting my logs if I use that.

I’ve always enjoyed taking part in the occasional annual SOTA Challenges if I can.

73 Phil G4OBK

1 Like

Excellent news indeed. In my short time of Sotaing, I’ve never noticed polarization mentioned on the Spots, if we are after DX contacts I’d have thought it vital information.

1 Like

Andrew,

If QRZ.com cannot be used, what can? Suppose I work a guy or gal and give their location as “Esperance, I’m good on the vhf Reflector, thanks for QSO 73”.

Asking for a friend.

73

Ron

VK3AFW

I think the problem is that unless the chaser confirms it with a loc we cannot be sure where he is operating from.

1 Like

If they haven’t given you a location you can’t manufacture one from other data. For starters, there’s potential issues around PII etc that I don’t want to have to deal with.

If they’ve told you where to find that information then they are effectively giving you the details you require.

1 Like

Why not?

Currently, if an activator mis-copies another summit reference or can’t read their log afterwards, they would no doubt check sotlas to find the error.

Same thing, really.

1 Like

Because a) they haven’t agreed to share their location (if they are just a straight chaser - not S2S) and b) if they haven’t told you where they are operating how do you know whether they are in a shack, using a remote station or portable in their car on the A3258?

How accurate a location would be required. A chaser gives a location as a town for instance which it would be possible to work out the locator square for, is that ok. For a large town it may cover multiple locators. A mobile station (ok unlikely on SSB/CW) says something like “Junction 25 of the M6” which is very specific can I use google maps to convert that.

I think I know the answer is “its not a contest, so use of best judgement is required etc” and I’m guessing that most SSB and CW operators on those bands will know their locator square but just wanted to be pedantic. One of my friends works me and doesn’t give his locator, but I know he is at home and I know the locator square off by heart, is that using other sources (my brain)?

These may sound like silly questions but when you don’t get out much and very unlikely to even be on page 1 of any honor roll, the addition of even a few points could be a bonus. Its going to add a new dimension to the 433alive days too , so that’s a good thing and I can see a boost for the 144 alive now that they’ve added an SSB section (vertical SSB from what I understand).

Time to dig the 9 element tonna from the garage :slight_smile:

2 Likes

To have a 2m SSB/CW challenge is excellent but adding 70cm SSB/CW is even better.

Time to dust off my SB 2/70 antenna.

5 Likes

I would think that most hams would know their Maidenhead locator position. Certainly if they are active in the DX modes they need that information. If not, to take part in this challenge they need to find it.

1 Like

Ok, get it. So:

POTA, SOTA or WWFF reference number. BTW, some POTA and WWFF are huge!

Lat, long - decimal

Maidenhead? I don’t see that mentioned. Or does Grid Reference allude to that?

If you use CSV uploads then you put
%QRA%AA22bb%
in the comment field.

If you only have ADIF export from your logging software you can use Christophe’s ON6ZQ excellent SOTA tools to convert your ADIF to CSV so you can add the Maidenhead.

1 Like