sotl.as AZ outlines for US+UK

Greetings all,

I’m working on a PhD involving LIDAR and geodetics. In an effort to overlap my study and hobby, I’ve learned a lot about Digital Elevation Models (DEM). I refactored code from WA7BEN/Ben and N0QLR/Shane, to generate activation zone contours from high-precision DEM. It is efficient and robust to outliers, so I’m able to process large areas.

The results are uploaded to sotl.as under each summit’s page. I completed the US (including Alaska!) and have recently published summits for G, GW, and some for GM. The AZs are represented by a light green, dashed area. There is an “AZ” button at the top to download the data.

You can review my open-source code here. AI was used in development to ensure code quality; iterations with the LLM were short and based on my manual research and test cases.

Interestingly, the code ran over the entire UK with no reported errors, owing to excellent curation of those summits by the Association Managers - kudos! Alaska was much more complicated, with moving glaciers, high-latitude reprojection errors, and more. No DEM was available for much of Scotland; only 12% of summits are outlined as a result. I did not fall back to lower-resolution DEM. The minimum I accepted is 1m horizontal, 10cm vertical unvegetated precision at p=0.95. In vegetated areas, this is approximately a 95th percentile within 30cm vertical. No data is preferable to bad data!

Please have a look at your favorite summits. If you find bad data in excess of the stated precision in the US or UK, I’m happy to look into it if you just let me know. HB9DQM/Manuel (of sotl.as) can also direct these bug reports as appropriate to other curators in other areas. So far, six reports of bad data have revealed coordinate transcription errors in the official database, and terrain changes due to recent mining operations.

These AZ outlines are for your convenience in planning. For example: it was convenient for me to query that there are five summits in England and Wales whose AZs contain a pub. I am happy to provide that list, and buy the first round, in exchange for a plane ticket!

However - the AZs are unofficial. The activator on the ground must be the authority on the matter. As with Archimedes’ lever, an activator with a shovel and enough gusto can activate any summit from anywhere!

I also must discourage use of this methodology for measuring prominence or disqualifying summits. It is statistically difficult to disprove a prominence claim using this DEM, due to the nature of confidence intervals and lack of Gaussian point distribution in vegetation. AA3TZ/Tom and I wrote some on the subject. The extent of my project is to outline the existing summits.

Enjoy - I hope this is useful to you!

AD8IS/Mike

10 Likes

Oh very nice!

I started wondering which 12% and browsed the map randomly but I couldn’t tell what the reasoning is for the ones in vs. out. Then I see there’s a list in the git repo, so I can see what’s what there. Although still not sure what the reason for why some do and some don’t have DEM data…but I suppose people collect it for specific reasons only.

I have that data!

Region Created Active summits Coverage
CS 3 124 2.4%
ES 8 87 9.2%
NS 2 155 1.3%
SI 48 223 21.5%
SS 73 283 25.8%
WS 12 347 3.5%
GM overall 146 1,219 12.0%

As for the reasoning - this high-precision LIDAR is collected from small aircraft flying at low altitudes. It is expensive to recalibrate the LIDAR and refuel the plane for large area coverage. In rural areas, 1m precision DEM doesn’t have a use case; 30m precision (from satellites) is sufficient for public purposes. So it’s an efficient use of government resources to leave the areas blank until someone expresses a demand for the data. Note that 1m (and better) commercial data exist, but I won’t be the one to write those grants :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Nice !

I think France has such a DEM covering all the country.

That would certainly explain the difference in coverage between SS, where most of the population in Scotland lives, and NS with probably the lowest population density. While that loosely aligns with what I’d expect to see on the mainland, I am surprised at how comparatively high the number is for the Scottish Islands (SI).

This is great, thanks. Good to check what the tool thinks is the AZ for tomorrow and I can compare with OS map/altimeter

Just guessing but perhaps something to do with coastline monitoring?