# Which carbon pole are you using?

Hi Brian, hi George,

it’s very interesting what you write, thank you! - Could you additionally give the name of your carbon poles? Carbon poles seem to be quite different.

73
Axel, DF1ET

100 Ohm resistance for an entire CF mast seems a bit odd.

And that assumes no additional resistance due to the sliding joints.

Richard,

Thank you for your calculations - your general assumptions seem fine, and if the resistivity of carbon fiber in our various poles is close to 1 ohm cm, these results center and improve this discussion.

Since I wrote my post above, I decided to measure the DC resistance of an entire carbon-fiber pole. I used a reliable Fluke 77 DVM and sharp-pointed probes. The probes were pushed through the lacquer/coatings when required. There were several interesting surprises:

1. It is true that the resistance measured between two relatively close points, 1-2 cm apart, on the outside of any pole segment is around 100 ohms, and sometimes I found lower numbers, like 20-30 ohms. This was done with pointed probes stuck into the CF composite. The resistance varies with pressure and position of the probes, and other factors. I got similar readings when the two probes were measuring around the pole, along the pole, or diagonally. No two pole sections behave quite the same.

2. I assembled an entire pole, roughly 6M long, from a Chinese source, sold on Ebay, no English part number or name, and attempted to measure the DC resistance. I quickly realized that the whole pole was too large to handle in my space - so I assembled two halves of the mast and tried again. I was unable to measure conductivity of either half! There was not a measurable DC connection across the length of either assembly.

3. Next I took one of the larger sections, about 2 cm in diameter, about 660 cm long , and measured:
A) Outside of pole, two points about 1 cm apart, ~30 to ~100 ohms
B) Outside of pole, one point at each end, ~30 to ~200 ohms, more variation
C) One point inside and one point outside, same end, no conductivity!
D) One point inside and one point outside, opposite ends, no conductivity!

4. I tried a smaller pole section, about 5 or 6 mm in diameter at its larger end:
A) Outside of pole, two points about 5 mm apart, ~30 to ~100 ohms
B) Outside of pole, one point at each end, ~30 to ~200 ohms, more variation
C) One point inside and one point outside, same end, ~30 to 200 ohms
D) One point inside and one point outside, opposite ends, ~30 to 200 ohms

5. I measured another carbon-fiber pole, different style with roughly similar dimensions, from a another Chinese source, also via Ebay, and got similar results. The larger sections did not have measurable conductivity between inside and outside surfaces, while the smaller-diameter sections had measurable conductivity.

6. I pulled out one more Chinese pole, a smaller, lighter model roughly 5.4M long, and again measured similar resistances. The largest sections did not have measurable conductivity between inside and outside surfaces, while the smaller-diameter sections had measurable conductivity. With this pole some of the larger sections between about 10 and 15mm diameter had conductivity between inside and outside surfaces. A couple of these sections measured between 20 and 30 ohms from one end to the other, with probes on the outside at each end.

I believe that how the carbon fiber fabric is laid and layered explains the measurements I see here. I suspect that the larger-diameter sections have more layers of material, since they are required to bear more force lower down on the pole; perhaps there are one or more insulating layers between the carbon-fiber layers.

Based on these measurements of pole sections, none of my poles have measurable conductivity along their entire length. Because the OUTSIDE of the bottom of each smaller section mates with the INSIDE of the next larger section, conductivity along the entire pole will not occur unless all sections conduct from the inside to the outside, which is not generally true for the larger sections.

After I had put my poles and meter probes away, I realized that the situation is NOT as simple as it seems so far…

Even if a pole section does not conduct DC from inside to outside, because of an insulating layer or layers, for RF we must consider Capacitance!

I measured several of my larger pole sections that have no measurable DC conductivity between inside and outside. I found capacitance on the order of 350 to 450 pF, when measuring from the inside to the outside of these sections. Each is a coaxial capacitor.

The reactance of these capacitors is approximately 28 ohms at 14 MHz, and 56 ohms at 7 MHz, so RF will flow through the insulating layers and flow through the entire pole after all, even if there is no DC connection along the entire pole. I have no information on how lossy the dielectric material in the pole fabric is, but we still have RF current running through the somewhat lossy graphite regardless.

Also no two poles are quite the the same, and we have a lot of variables to measure and estimate. The combinations of L, C, and R, along with the dimensions of the various pole segments, some with different cross-connections than others, create a complex set of circuits at various RF frequencies.

Despite my over-simplified description in the earlier post above, I stand by most of the conclusions!

We should go ahead and enjoy the benefits of lightweight carbon-fiber poles, while trying to keep our wires well away from these poles, and not worry much about the inevitable losses that may exist. These poles have been proven to work incredibly well in the hands of competent SOTA activators!

If carbon fiber seems too tricky, revert to fiberglass!

Hopefully some clever people will do careful A-B comparisons at RF for similar-sized CF and fiberglass poles…

Every portable antenna system has many other significant losses:

Ground loss due to currents in radials
Ground loss due to induced currents
Conductor loss
Losses in trees and rocks
Tuner losses
Balun or transformer loss
Mismatch loss
Coaxial cable loss
Etc.

The key thing to take away here is that the various carbon-fiber pole sections are often not built the same, so gross assumptions may be misleading. I surely was surprised this morning!

Your results almost certainly will vary…

73

George/Carey
KX0R

Just posted a short video answering some of the questions raised by my tests on the Carbon-6 mast. CARBON FIBER MAST - FOLLOW UP - YouTube

When I first started in SOTA a match fisherman friend gave me a spare carbon fibre pole. I was concerned about its possible conductivity but when I tested it with an AVO 8 I found that I could not detect any conductivity at all, measuring both longitudinally and transversely on cleaned edges and surfaces. Unfortunately it did not survive a winter gale so I cannot identify it. According to Wiki some carbon fibre composites include aluminium and I guess that this type of composite would be more conductive.

Hi Richard

Interesting video! The bung in the Carbon-6 pole seems to have a devastating effect - presumably loaded with Carbon Black…

From papers I’ve read related mainly to the aeronautics industry, lack of conductivity of carbon fibre composites is an issue and additives are used to improve it. It could be that not all carbon fibre poles are created equal when it comes to conductivity… Though given that contact with overhead power lines is a well-recognised hazard I’d imagine most fishing pole manufacturers would aim for maximum resistance!

73 de Paul G4MD

Richard, I sometimes use pultruded carbon fibre tubes (for their cryogenic thermal resistivity). Despite the co-alignment of the fibres these apparently have a similar dc resistivity, within the range from Liang et al.

Anecdotally, colleagues of mine were, some time ago, using mirrors made of carbon fibre for work at Ka band (26 - 36 GHz). They had some trouble with the aluminium coating. IIRC it eventually came off, and the bare CF was about as good. They replaced them with better mirrors finally, of course.

1 Like

The world is not perfect …
I know that the RG174 coaxial cable has more losses, I know that my dipole vertice is only 5 meters from the ground, and I also know that carbon fiber mast is conductive and should have a small influence on the performance of the set. …
But SOTA is also climbing peaks, carrying a backpack, having mobility, etc. What matters if the cable losses if it is light, what matters the height of the mast if it is easy to carry, what matters if the mast is conductor if it is cheaper?
In my opinion, there are details that don’t matter when working /P

3 Likes

Reviving this thread. Anyone willing to share their 2022 picks for a carbon fiber mast? Looking to shed some weight on my current SOTA load-out. Currently looking at this 6m mast from Sotabeams:

If anyone has any preferential alternatives, I’d definitely like to hear about them.

2 Likes

@W0MCB Hi Mike

I have used the Sotabeams 6m CF pole for quite a few years now. It’s great for my EFHW, super light and fits inside my rucksack…does the job for me to support wire as inverted V or distant suppport. However, don’t use it as a support for a dipole as it has been known to break (Sotabeams mention this in their advert). Don’t support a Slim J or similar with it as it markedly upsets the vswr as tested with my analyser. Finally, I take out the first thin top section and work with the next section. Hope this helps.

73 Allan

Hi,
I use no carbon poles, I use a single pole, length of myself (1,80m or about 6 ft), is made of wood, can be unscrewed in the middle in 2 parts of even length.
Such a long pole has a lot of advantages:
Has always the best length: with each step you can change your grip so that length of pole is always optimal with regard to terrain.
In ascending, because of its length one has a lot of support with large step downs.
Carbon pole, or better the loop which normally is to be around your wrist is dangerous, very dangerous in the mountains If you fall and the pole gets stuck, the loop around your wrist, your wrist, your arm will break like a thin twig.
73 Patrick ON4BCA

1 Like

You should ALWAYS remove your wrist from walking pole loops when descending

4 Likes

…but not from Ice Axe loops.

1 Like

yes sometimes you can overthink the problem

Dec

I always climbed leashless but then vertical water ice in Rjukan was my buzz , long before SOTA though

Dec

2 Likes

@GW4VPX Thanks Allan. Good to hear you like it. I’m shocked that there aren’t more telescoping carbon mast manufacturers. There are some Crappie poles and kite poles available that are obviously adaptable, but not many dedicated for the amateur market. I’m currently using a Packtenna mini set up as 20m monoband as a sloper mostly, so shouldn’t be much of an issue, weight-wise. I’ll probably pick it up. Thanks again!

I feel the advantages of carbon poles vastly outweighs any perceived (or negligible) disadvantages and paralysis by over-analysis in the SOTA environment. Thanks to all who have done the conductivity homework ahead of time to prove the concern is not worth the worry, if handled correctly.

2 Likes

I have done a small study on dealing with the common CF pole conductivity. It is very east to see the impact on SWR when using a vertical parallel to the CF pole. It is quite substantial. Here is a short article I wrote about the effects and a possible solution to break the CF pole into shorter sections, further from resonance at 20 M. Use of Carbon Fiber Push Up Poles for Antenna support.pdf - Google Drive
Brian N6IZ

2 Likes

Interesting read and workable solution Brian. Yeah, my plan is to continue using an aggressive sloping angle on the EFHW to the extent feasible. I knew there was an issue on “vertical” arrangements, thus my “if handled correctly” caveat. Haha. I should have clarified my response a little more. I’m assuming that if mitigated to an acceptable level, the juice will still be worth the squeeze at the end of the day with the weight savings. I’ll have to do some experiments with my analyzer to see where I stand when I get the mast. I’ll come back to post my results. Thanks!

Hi Mike,

I agree, if you can slope the pole, or the wire , so the antenna is not close and parallel the effect drops quickly . Using these poles as the center support for an EFHW should see no real issues. Personally I prefer 1/4 wave antennas (not sure why) and about 50% of the time I have no tuner with me, so SWR makes or breaks an activation (no tuner to hide my sins). Regards,
Brian

1 Like

Great article Brian, thanks

Geoff vk3sq