Hello,
Yesterday I put a spot for EA5HOP on EA5/AT-010. The correct summit was EA7/AT-016.
Apologies.
73 José
Hi José @EA7GV
EA7/AT-016 is not a valid summit !!? but EA5/AT-016 is OK 
73 & HNY Éric
Hi Eric,
Sorry, the years do not forgive, EA5/AT-016 is correct.
73 & HNY José
1 Like
Hello,
after verification of EA5HOP/P activation, I am sorry to report that he was activating a VG (Geodetic Vertex award) in the summit of Mt. Cid (1104 m).
There is a SOTA summit near this one, towards North on the same range, called Silla del Cid (1147 m), which is SOTA ref EA5/AT-016, but he wasn’t there.
Perhaps the similar name confused the activator and chasers who wrongly spotted him as being in a SOTA.
EA5HOP has been informed and should delete his log from Sotadata.
Please, if you chased EA5HOP on 3 Jan 2022, make sure you delete him from your log as well.
73 de Ignacio
1 Like
Thanks, Ignacio, for making us aware of the mistake.
I have just deleted my chaser QSO from the SOTAdatabase:
However, I’ll keep this non-SOTA QSO in my main logging programbecause it was a valid non-SOTA QSO.
73,
Guru
1 Like
I must come and do that someday, El Cid (1961, starring Charlton Heston and Sophia Loren) was one of my favourite movies 
1 Like
True Ignacio, all that remains is for ea5hop to delete the log from the database.
73
1 Like