It appears that it is now legal to cycle up to the summit as the landowner has re-designated the path as a shared space for walkers and cyclists. However, as the current path appears to have been laid specifically to deter cycling (under the old regime), dont expect an easy ride.
I believe in live and let live, but I have had a few dreadful experiences with arrogant and selfish cyclists in the hills, so I can sympathise with Tomâs comment. Most of them are considerate towards walkers but its the relatively few that arenât that you remember!
Yes, that will be a problem. Seems not to be an issue on Minch Moor GM/SS-133 but mainly because the up rides are less steep than the downhill sections.
Iâm not sure how it is on private paths however on public shared paths over here, the cyclists always have to give way to pedestrians - who have âright-of-wayâ. If the cyclists donât give way or do something that could cause an accident the police can and will be called. I do both along these paths by the way - walk and ride and find with this rule in place it is very rare if at all that problems occur.
I think thatâs a bit of a sweeping statement, Tom. The race-through-red-lights types, much publicised in the tabloid newspapers, are a small minority. As someone who commuted to work by bike for decades, I found many motorists (about 5%) drive dangerously close to cyclists or âcut them upâ at junctions. Cyclists have to cycle defensively for their own safety (e.g. move to the middle of the lane to dissuade drivers from squeezing pass at a bend or restriction). Drivers, denied shaving 50ms off their journey time should not get annoyed but cool it and think about Climate Change or something.
Me too Brian, itâs always the competitive alpha-male type who thinks shared trails are for their exclusive use, and when politely asked to be more careful around other people, give you or your misses verbal abuse.
In my (former) local woods the âNo Cyclingâ badges put on the âbarrier gatesâ to walking paths by the Forestry Commission ranger would be torn off usually within days
I speak as a keen walker, on-and-off-road cyclist and motorist.
I think about climate change every time I start my 300+ BHP car engine. Thatâs because while it has significantly lower emissions than my previous 242BHP car had, the VED is ÂŁ450 / yr compared to the previous ÂŁ200 (or so) / yr for the more polluting. Go figure.
Still having paid so much to get it on the road, I drive it more than my previous car which is not what the smart people in power want.
I think Iâll make a âThunburg Dis-approvedâ sticker to put in the back window along with the On-Digital Monkey
I have to dismantle too much of the bike to fit it in the estate car. So I use the pickup to move the bike about and its emissions make the Torrey Canyon look minimal
I intend to do many more bike activations in 2020.
Yeah, either Tewkesburyâs the centre of the universe of bad cyclists OR this is another classic case of confirmation bias, i.e. when you remember only those events that reinforce your strongly-held opinion and ignore those events that donât.
There is plenty of evidence of climate change. The argument is whether it is man-made or a natural cyclic event. Irrespective of whether you believe itâs man-made or not, reducing pollution and emissions seems to be a reasonable thing to do. I did that by buying a car that is much less polluting than the one it replaced only to find that the VED is no longer based on emissions (because too many people bought low-emission cars and government income dropped) but on the retail price. And not what you pay for a pre-owned and cherished example but the price it was when some fool paid for it new at the dealer!