In reply to Z35M:
The criteria is the activation of an individual activator with highest
number of QSOs.
Hi,
I understand that is the largest number of QSOs in a “single operator”?, if so, there is a station at least they called several operators with the same call, even in 2 bands simultaneously.
Also see stations missing from the list. 
Congratulations on the initiative.
73 to all
In reply to EB5AL:
In reply to Z35M:
The criteria is the activation of an individual activator with
highest
number of QSOs.Hi,
I understand that is the largest number of QSOs in a “single
operator”?, if so, there is a station at least they called
several operators with the same call, even in 2 bands simultaneously.
Indeed, taking a sample of the log of EA5WP 706 EA5/CS-001 03/09/2011
07:18z 9A4W 14MHz CW
07:18z YO3BAP 14MHz CW
07:18z EA3KN 14MHz CW
07:18z SP3JTU 14MHz CW
07:18z IK1DFH 7MHz SSB
07:18z IK1GPG 7MHz SSB
07:18z EA8BWY 7MHz SSB
Four contacts on CW and 3 contacts on SSB in 1 minute by a single operator, can only be described as “impressive”!
73 Mike
2E0YYY
In reply to EB5AL:
Por favor, sola operación, no solo operador.
In reply to 2E0YYY:
There no limit on the number of operators in an activation. As long as the each operator made a person powered final ascent and followed the rules on generators, fixed antennas etc. then you could have 4 operators each make 1 QSO on a different band at the same time using the same callsign. The whole activation could be over in under a minute.
Andy
MM0FMF
In reply to MM0FMF:
In reply to EB5AL:
Por favor, sola operación, no solo operador.
Hi Andy,
ok sorry, issue clarified, misunderstood the definition “individual activator.”
73 to all
In reply to MM0FMF:
In reply to EB5AL:
Por favor, sola operación, no solo operador.
In reply to 2E0YYY:
There no limit on the number of operators in an activation. As long as
the each operator made a person powered final ascent and followed the
rules on generators, fixed antennas etc. then you could have 4
operators each make 1 QSO on a different band at the same time using
the same callsign. The whole activation could be over in under a
minute.
You seem to forget Andy, the SOTA Management Team wants nothing to do with any official highest acivation score list. So quoting SOTA rules in an unofficial highest score list is at best, a bit rich…
How this is run should be decided amongst the activators themselves and having two operators working at the same time on an activation and then claiming the highest score, most certainly dosen’t work for me.
I’d be interested to hear the other Activators comments on this…
73 Mike
2E0YYY
In reply to EB5AL:
Vlado originally asked for highest QSO count in a single activation. He did say he was especially interested if it was a single activator. He didn’t say no multiple activations. It is the first post in this thread.
Andy
MM0FMF
The record score of EA5WP was added on the rank list based on the database research. Jose, EA5WP maybe is not aware that we put his score on the top of the rank list of single operator activations. I checked his activation LOG and find that Mike, 2E0YYY is right, this operation was probably run at least by two operators and two stations simultainesly. This is not fault for valid SOTA activation, but has effect on our topic. The score of EA5WP will be deleted from the rank list. Of course Jose, EA5WP has right to join this discution and if he wish he may to submit the same score for this listing declaring that the activation was done by single operator.
Vlado, Z35M
In reply to MM0FMF:
There no limit on the number of operators in an activation.
True, but each operator’s contacts must be counted separately. General Rule 3.7.1(11) is very clear on this matter. Each of the operators should enter their contacts under their own database account. The fact that they used the same callsign is irrelevant and the rules say so explicitly.
then you could have 4
operators each make 1 QSO on a different band at the same time using
the same callsign. The whole activation could be over in under a
minute.
None of the operators would have qualified the summit.
Martyn M1MAJ
In reply to M1MAJ:
In reply to MM0FMF:
There no limit on the number of operators in an activation.
True, but each operator’s contacts must be counted separately. General
Rule 3.7.1(11) is very clear on this matter. Each of the operators
should enter their contacts under their own database account. The fact
that they used the same callsign is irrelevant and the rules say so
explicitly.then you could have 4
operators each make 1 QSO on a different band at the same time
using
the same callsign. The whole activation could be over in under a
minute.None of the operators would have qualified the summit.
Hi Martyn,
Thanks for taking the time to clear this matter up…
73 Mike
2E0YYY
In reply to Z35M:
The record score of EA5WP was added on the rank list based on the
database research. Jose, EA5WP maybe is not aware that we put his
score on the top of the rank list of single operator activations. I
checked his activation LOG and find that Mike, 2E0YYY is right, this
operation was probably run at least by two operators and two stations
simultainesly.
Hi Vlado, thanks for looking into this matter.
There are SOTA activators who put a lot of time an effort into long activations. As it stands at the moment, the unnofficial rules need to be sorted out so that everyone is using the same rule book.
No single country should have an unfair advantage over every other country.
I’ll be in touch with you in due course with some suggestions to improve the way this type of activation is conducted…
73 Mike
2E0YYY
In reply to G0LGS:
he list is updated with data submitted by activators themselves!
Thanks Steward for the answer, now I am clear!
Holger OE7HPI
In reply to M1MAJ:
Ah, yes Martyn, you are quite right about the 4 QSO each. So the whole activation could be over in a couple of minutes rather than 1.
As for this case it looks to be a logging error if there were multiple operators. They should have been logged under the individual activator’s accounts but with the callsign used rather than all in one account.
However, I think my database query would have still returned the same count and callsign even if they were in separate user accounts as it looks at the activator logs which stores callsign used which can be different to the activator’s call. The webpage for these stats runs on the database at home not the public one so I can’t check now.
Andy
MM0FMF
In reply to Z35M:
16/Jul/2011 EA2/BI-056 (Serantes) EC2AG/P 66 QSO
23/Jul/2011 EA2/BI-028 (Intxorta) EC2AG/P 41 QSO
26/Nov/2011 EA2/BI-042 (Murga) EC2AG/P 47 QSO
03/Dec/2011 EA1/CT-116 (Betayo) EC2AG/1 47 QSO
04/Dec/2011 EA2/BI-065 (Arrizurigana) EC2AG/P 52 QSO
10/Dec/2011 EA2/BI-023 (Urko) EC2AG/P 55 QSO
11/Dec/2011 EA2/SS-031 (Kalamua) EC2AG/P 50 QSO
08/Jan/2012 EA1/CT-086 (Mello) EC2AG/1 56 QSO
15/Jan/2012 EA2/BI-043 (Jata) EC2AG/P 50 QSO
73""
In reply to OE7HPI:
In reply to G0LGS:
he list is updated with data submitted by activators themselves!
I see, i missed to publish my last information:
26/Jul/2011 TK/TK-121 (Punta Pozzo di Borgo) TK/OE5RTP/P 121 QSO
73 de OE5RTP
Rank list of the single operator SOTA activations with highest QSO totals:
1 EA5ER 491 EA5/AT-039 20/11/2011
2 HA3HK 430 HA/DD-012 20/06/2011
3 DL8JJ 401 DM/HE-037 24/03/2012
4 EA2RKG 370 EA2/SS-055 22/01/2011
5 MW1EYP 369 NW/NW-012 02/08/2011
6 SM3TLG 364 SM/GA-001 11/08/2010
7 Z35M 337 Z3/WM-046 20/03/2010 CW Only
8 EA3EGB 316 EA3/GI-011 30/01/2011
9 G4OBK 262 G/TW-004 06/05/2010
10 2E0YYY 248 S/SP-004 27/07/2011 2m FM:244, 70cm FM:4
11 HA5CW 245 HA/KM-028 27/12/2009
12 F6HBI 241 F/AM-564 25/03/2011
13 EA4TX 229 EA4/MD-008 02/10/2010
14 DL5WW 221 DM/SA-001 04/10/2009
15 TK8B 203 TK/TK-112 09/08/2009
16 OK1FFU 193 OK/ST-040 16/10/2010
17 HA7UL 184 HA/KM-009 10/03/2010
18 HA5LV 181 HA/KM-015 18/03/2010
19 OE9MON 168 OE/VB-473 02/08/2010
20 HA/ON6UU 164 HA/ND-004 27/08/2011
21 GM6WRW 162 GM/SI-134 19/06/2011
22 M0LKB 160 G/LD-013 04/09/2005
=22 G1INK 160 G/SP-013 17/08/2008
=22 EE1URO 160 EA1/OU-001 01/08/2010
25 OE6VHF 154 OE/ST-281 31/12/2009
26 Z35F 153 Z3/WM-052 02/08/2010
27 HA5MA 149 HA/DD-007 27/04/2010
28 S58SOTA 148 S5/CP-011 13/06/2009
29 F5LKW 145 F/CR-198 12/11/2010
30 GX0OOO 143 G/NP-008 05/07/2009
31 GW0PZO 135 GW/NW-044 13/06/2004
32 OE5HCE 132 OE/OO-035 07/01/2011
33 DF2GN 130 DM/BW-005 23/12/2007
34 TK/OE5RTP 121 TK/TK-121 26/07/2011
35 F6ENO 120 F/VO-077 03/07/2008
36 S53X 119 S5/BR-024 07/02/2009
37 DH8DX 118 DM/TH-099 25/04/2008
=37 S51RU 118 S5/PK-005 19/09/2009
39 DL4OCE 115 DM/NS-008 17/04/2011
40 G6LKB 114 G/LD-049 07/04/2007
41 GW4EVX 109 GW/NW-051 11/06/2006
42 G3NYY 105 G/WB-023 18/10/2009
43 MW6UPH 103 GW/NW-033 24/04/2011
44 DO1DJJ 102 DM/RP-001 01/11/2010
45 F5UKL 101 F/PO-238 03/05/2009
46 S52FT 100 S5/PK-001 03/08/2008
47 MW0TUB 99 GW/NW-012 17/07/2011
48 GW0DSP 91 GW/NW-062 19/03/2009
=48 S57D 91 S5/CP-026 17/07/2010
50 DL2AJB 87 DM/TH-096 25/02/2011
51 ON6DSL 85 DM/RP-003 24/12/2007
52 GW4OIG 80 GW/NW-012 23/04/2006
53 OE5REO 79 OE/OO-284 21/11/2009
54 GA8OTI 78 GM/SS-271 08/09/2009
55 GR0LGS 70 G/WB-024 01/05/2011
56 G8HXE 67 G/SP-013 08/07/2007
57 EC2AG 66 EA2/BI-056 16/07/2011
58 F/VA2SG 64 F/PO-177 20/09/2010
=58 G8TMV 64 G/TW-005 20/11/2010
60 DL/PA3FYG 62 DM/BW-273 22/07/2009
=60 G3OHC 62 G/TW-004 13/06/2010
62 GW6DTN 61 GW/NW-001 02/09/2010
63 G7AAV 60 G/WB-008 29/08/2009
64 M6ADB 57 G/SE-006 28/04/2011
65 DL/ON3WAB 51 DM/RP-282 13/08/2009
66 M3EYP 50 G/SP-013 02/05/2009
67 G4AFI 43 G/SE-001 26/10/2011
68 LA1KHA 40 LA/TM-011 02/05/2009
69 2W0LAE 37 GW/NW-012 03/05/2009
=69 VE2JCM 37 VE2/LR-002 13/11/2010
71 G3YMC 28 G/CE-001 30/09/2010
Note: This listing is NOT an official honor roll. The list is updated
with data submitted by activators themselves. Activators may request
their score be excluded from the list.
In reply to Z35M:
Hello Guys,
on 24.03.2012 DM/HE-037 Eisenberg done 401 QSOs.
It was a BIG fun!
cu, vy 73
de DL8JJ
Emil
In reply to DL8JJ:
Congratulations Emil!
Your score is updated on the rank list (see above).
Vlado, Z35M
Four contacts on CW and 3 contacts on SSB in 1 minute by a single
operator, can only be described as “impressive”!
Maybe The clock was faulty Mike
Just like the faulty tape measure i used to make sure my 60m ant is below 5m agl
I struggle with 7wpm cw let alone 7 qso’s HI
See you in Blackpool
Aled
MW0UPH
It would be very interesting if we had the possibility to query sotadata and extract this info direct from the database. But as this topic is kind of old, maybe it’s already possible. Anyone know about it?
This topic was automatically closed after reaching the maximum limit of 100 replies. Continue discussion at What is the highest QSO total of single activation (Part 2).