Duplicate Summits

[G4OIG]

@M1EYP

So suppose there is a summit on the border between association XX and association YY. Suppose it currently has two SOTA references - XX/AA-001 and YY/BB-001. After the change it might just have one valid reference, say XX/AA-001. But activators would still be able to activate it from the BB side of the border with their BB prefix. There simply is not a problem.

Apart from the fact that the MT allowed this situation to happen in the first place and the proposed change will cause an upset to some.

@SQ6GIT

Wouldn’t it be easier for everyone, including MT, to:either

1. link the summits in DB so the server scoring would allow just 1 score?

I like this idea - surely a KISS principle if ever there was one.!

Gerald G4OIG